KestravsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Kestra | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 30 053 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 737 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 59 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).
Kestra details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Kestra, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with