JoplinvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Joplin | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 56 912 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +436 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 33 |
| Latest release | v3.7.21 · 25 Sept 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Joplin scores 83/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Joplin.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Joplin needs more configuration.
Joplin is growing faster right now (+436 stars in 30 days).
Joplin details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep Joplin, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with