Trilium NotesvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Trilium Notes | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 38 601 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +645 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 33 |
| Latest release | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Trilium Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Trilium Notes needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+645 stars in 30 days).
Trilium Notes details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep Trilium Notes, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with