JoplinvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Joplin | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 56 913 | 117 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +437 | +5 518 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.22 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 83/100 for Joplin, so it is the safer default.
Joplin ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 518 stars in 30 days).
Joplin details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Joplin, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with