Super ProductivityvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Super Productivity | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 34 in Task Management | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 23 237 | 117 928 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 016 | +5 569 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 11 |
| Latest release | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 83/100 for Super Productivity, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).
Super Productivity details →TradingAgents details →