nocodbvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 65 375 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +313 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+313 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with