HyperSwitchvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 45 523 | 24 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 612 | +775 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 81/100 for HyperSwitch, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 612 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with