HyperSwitchvsOctoBot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HyperSwitch | OctoBot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Fintech | #6 of 42 in Cryptocurrency |
| GitHub stars | 45 506 | 6 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 676 | +266 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.127.0 · 23 Sept 2026 | 2.1.1 · 30 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
HyperSwitch scores 81/100 against 69/100 for OctoBot, so it is the safer default.
OctoBot ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for HyperSwitch.
If you want the quickest setup, OctoBot is easier to run; HyperSwitch needs more configuration.
HyperSwitch is growing faster right now (+1 676 stars in 30 days).
HyperSwitch details →OctoBot details →
Swap a project
Keep HyperSwitch, compare it with
Keep OctoBot, compare it with