PanWatchvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PanWatch | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 2 270 | 24 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +119 | +774 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+774 stars in 30 days).
PanWatch details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep PanWatch, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with