HiClawvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 93 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +1 287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 287 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →uptime-kuma details →