Orcavsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 108 642 | 93 027 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 735 | +1 280 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 88/100 for uptime-kuma, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 735 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with