HiClawvslangflow
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 156 085 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +894 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+894 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →langflow details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep HiClaw, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with