HiClawvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 117 750 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +5 391 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 391 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →TradingAgents details →All AI Agents projects →