HiClawvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| HiClaw | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
HiClaw scores 67/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).
HiClaw details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →