n8nvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| n8n | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 208 910 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 101 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 205 | 0 |
| Latest release | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
n8n scores 92/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; n8n needs more configuration.
n8n is growing faster right now (+3 101 stars in 30 days).
n8n details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep n8n, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with