langflowvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 156 115 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +924 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+924 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with