Healthchecksvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks and woodpecker-ci score the same (73/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.
Healthchecks details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with