Upptimevswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 17 183 | 8 065 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +-1 | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Markdown | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Upptime, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with