HealthchecksvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 18 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with