UpptimevsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 17 187 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 18 |
| Latest release | — | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Markdown | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with