HealthchecksvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with