UpptimevsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Upptime | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 17 185 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Markdown | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
Upptime details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep Upptime, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with