hass-configuratorvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Octoprint scores 73/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
Octoprint is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with