Fleetvshass-configurator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fleet | hass-configurator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Device Management | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 7 069 | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 2 |
| Latest release | fleet-v4.94.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Fleet scores 67/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Fleet ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
If you want the quickest setup, hass-configurator is easier to run; Fleet needs more configuration.
Fleet details →hass-configurator details →
Swap a project
Keep Fleet, compare it with
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with