hass-configuratorvszookeeper
Two self-hosted Configuration Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hass-configurator | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 339 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
hass-configurator ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
zookeeper is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
hass-configurator details →zookeeper details →All Configuration Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with