go2rtcvsHealthchecks
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| go2rtc | Healthchecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 54 in Media Streaming | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 520 | 10 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.9.15 · 25 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
go2rtc scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for go2rtc.
If you want the quickest setup, go2rtc is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
go2rtc is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).
go2rtc details →Healthchecks details →
Swap a project
Keep go2rtc, compare it with
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with