copypartyvsHealthchecks
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Healthchecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 | 10 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Healthchecks details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with