HealthchecksvsNavidrome Music Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Navidrome Music Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 24 411 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +653 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.64.2 · 23 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Navidrome Music Server scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Navidrome Music Server ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Navidrome Music Server is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Navidrome Music Server is growing faster right now (+653 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Navidrome Music Server details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Navidrome Music Server, compare it with