Ghostfoliovsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Ghostfolio | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 62 in Personal Finance | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 9 602 | 93 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +256 | +1 256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 104 | 19 |
| Latest release | 3.94.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 75/100 for Ghostfolio, so it is the safer default.
Ghostfolio ships more often: 104 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Ghostfolio needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 256 stars in 30 days).
Ghostfolio details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Ghostfolio, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with