Actualvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Actual | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 62 in Personal Finance | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 29 840 | 93 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +704 | +1 256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 81/100 for Actual, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Actual.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Actual needs more configuration.
Actual details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Actual, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with