faasvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| faas | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Serverless | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 26 253 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.27.14 · 2 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 68/100 for faas, so it is the safer default.
faas ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; faas needs more configuration.
faas is growing faster right now (+8 stars in 30 days).
faas details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep faas, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with