beamvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #29 of 125 in AI | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 0 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 61/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
beam is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
beam details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with