openwhiskvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openwhisk | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Serverless | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 6 803 | 17 183 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Scala | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.
openwhisk is growing faster right now (+5 stars in 30 days).
openwhisk details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep openwhisk, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with