EpicStaffvsKestra
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EpicStaff | Kestra | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #123 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 359 | 30 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 737 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 59 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 8 Oct 2026 | v1.3.45 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Kestra scores 82/100 against 47/100 for EpicStaff, so it is the safer default.
Kestra ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for EpicStaff.
If you want the quickest setup, Kestra is easier to run; EpicStaff needs more configuration.
Kestra is growing faster right now (+1 737 stars in 30 days).
EpicStaff details →Kestra details →