EpicStaffvsOrca
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EpicStaff | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #123 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 359 | 108 958 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +9 051 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 8 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 47/100 for EpicStaff, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for EpicStaff.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; EpicStaff needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 051 stars in 30 days).
EpicStaff details →Orca details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep EpicStaff, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with