EdenTextvsPaddleOCR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EdenText | PaddleOCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 561 | 91 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 49/100 for EdenText, so it is the safer default.
EdenText ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, EdenText is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).
EdenText details →PaddleOCR details →
Swap a project
Keep EdenText, compare it with
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with