EdenTextvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted Document Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| EdenText | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 46 in Document Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 560 | 45 002 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 629 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.12.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 49/100 for EdenText, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for EdenText.
If you want the quickest setup, EdenText is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).
EdenText details →Reactive Resume details →All Document Management projects →
Swap a project
Keep EdenText, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with