docker-pi-holevsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 5 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Octoprint needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with