corednsvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
coredns scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
coredns details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with