OctoprintvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Octoprint | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 9 167 | 61 542 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +59 | +498 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 |
| Latest release | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).
Octoprint details →Pi-hole details →