DeepSeek Harnessvstrip2g
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | trip2g | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 265 481 | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 489 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.
trip2g ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 489 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →trip2g details →