DeepSeek HarnessvsSwitch
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Switch | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #74 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 1 958 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 54/100 for Switch, so it is the safer default.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Switch details →All AI Agents projects →