DeepSeek HarnessvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 23 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | +1 002 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 |
| Latest release | — | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 83/100 for Super Productivity, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Super Productivity details →