DeepSeek Harnessvsspeech-to-phrase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | speech-to-phrase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
speech-to-phrase ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →speech-to-phrase details →