Orcavsspeech-to-phrase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | speech-to-phrase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 108 898 | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 991 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 991 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →speech-to-phrase details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep speech-to-phrase, compare it with