DeepSeek HarnessvsSOLECTRUS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | SOLECTRUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #20 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 265 139 | 166 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 147 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.4 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 51/100 for SOLECTRUS, so it is the safer default.
SOLECTRUS ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 147 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →SOLECTRUS details →