DeepSeek HarnessvsSlipshow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Slipshow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #11 of 38 in Personal Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 265 285 | 901 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 293 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | v0.13.0 · 5 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 52/100 for Slipshow, so it is the safer default.
Slipshow ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Slipshow is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 293 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Slipshow details →