DeepSeek HarnessvsSandBase Harness
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | SandBase Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 755 | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 763 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.
SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 763 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →SandBase Harness details →All AI Agents projects →