DeepSeek HarnessvsRustDesk Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | RustDesk Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 22 in Remote Desktop |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 | 10 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 | +175 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | 1.1.16 · 20 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 74/100 for RustDesk Server, so it is the safer default.
RustDesk Server ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, RustDesk Server is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →RustDesk Server details →