DeepSeek HarnessvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 265 481 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 489 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 489 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →QGIS Web Client details →